Week 8 - Group Presentation Review (Intellectual Property)

Presentation 1

Team Name - The Last Suprematist Sculpture

Team Members - Vedran, Alyssa

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION
The written content for this presentation was powerful and clear. The group created a well-structured and organised presentation. There were slides within the presentation which used a small font allowing the group to fit a lot of information into the one slide; however this made it difficult to read. 

DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES
During the presentation multiple examples were included to assist in communicating their message. The examples used were specific and interesting, with the group providing many examples relating to their project.

CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT
The group demonstrated a sound understanding of the topic. Their video was entertaining which helped clarify the topic of IP. 


Presentation 2

Team Name - Gothic Architecture

Team Members - Maki, Alan, Dorothy, Ricky, Stefan 

CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION
The presentation on intellectual property was detailed and informative, with the group providing thorough explanations of all aspects of the topic. The oral presentation communicated the topic well. Each member of the group defined the topic’s meanings and used examples which enriched the understandings of the audience. 

CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION
The written component of the group’s presentation was clear and succinct. Overall the written text was simple and easy to read, communicating their information across effectively. 

CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT
They demonstrated their understanding of the topic by explaining the use intellectual property and how it applies to their situation. They mentioned the Intellectual Property Agreement in UNSW which relates to students, how to register for an IP and the confusing part of taking photos in public, who owns the rights.